Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

2141

reference
78-tree-1
name
2141
tree-preservation-order

undefined

78-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.948376 50.847394)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.948320 50.847388,-0.948322 50.847399,-0.948330 50.847409,-0.948342 50.847417,-0.948358 50.847422,-0.948376 50.847424,-0.948393 50.847422,-0.948409 50.847418,-0.948422 50.847410,-0.948430 50.847400,-0.948433 50.847389,-0.948431 50.847378,-0.948423 50.847367,-0.948410 50.847359,-0.948395 50.847354,-0.948377 50.847352,-0.948360 50.847354,-0.948344 50.847359,-0.948331 50.847367,-0.948323 50.847377,-0.948320 50.847388)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL